REDA One Help Center
EN
Language
English EN Español ES Português PT Italiano coming soon Français FR Deutsch coming soon العربية coming soon
reda.one ↗
Home / REDA Financials AI / Administration / Security & Audit / Field History Tracking

Field History Tracking

Sometimes the question isn’t “what happened” but “what exactly changed — from what, to what, by whom?” That’s field history tracking: on the fields that matter for financial control, every change is recorded as old value → new value, with author and timestamp, visible in each record’s history.

What’s tracked

REDA Financials ships with tracking enabled on the critical fields of its objects — the ones an auditor cares about: statuses, amounts, key relationships (vendor, customer, entity), dates and ownership. The platform allows a bounded number of tracked fields per object, so the selection is curated for control value; your administrator can adjust it where your compliance needs differ.

The curated selection concentrates on five kinds of fields:

Tracked categoryWhy it earns a slotExample question it answers
StatusesStatus changes are the control moments — draft to posted, approved to rejected"When did this move to Posted, and who moved it?"
AmountsMoney fields are what reviews revolve around"What was the amount before it was corrected?"
Key relationshipsVendor, customer and entity determine whose books and whose money"Was this bill ever pointed at a different vendor?"
DatesDates drive periods, due dates and aging"Who moved the document date, and from what?"
OwnershipWho's responsible for the record"When did this account change hands?"
Spend the tracking budget on control value. The platform's per-object limit is a feature in disguise: it forces the question "would an auditor care about this field?" If your compliance needs differ from the shipped selection, adjust it deliberately — swap fields in and out with the reviewer's questions in mind, not day-to-day curiosity.

Reading a record’s history

Open the record’s history (part of the Audit Trail tab on document pages) and read the trail: Status: Draft → Posted, by K. Sharma, 2 July 2026 12:36. For posted documents the trail is naturally short — that’s the locking doing its job; the interesting histories belong to drafts and master data.

A worked read — Meridian answers an auditor

Meridian Properties Group's auditor picks a posted purchase invoice and asks the classic three-part question: who set this amount, was it ever different, and who posted it? The controller opens the invoice's Audit Trail tab and reads downward: the amount's history shows the original value entered at creation, one correction while the document was still a draft — old value, new value, author, timestamp — and then the status change to Posted. After that, nothing: the lock on posted documents means the trail simply stops, which is itself the answer to "could anyone have changed it since?" The whole exchange takes a minute, and every line of it is system-written.

Where field history sits in the evidence chain

LayerProvesWhere to look
Audit LogThe event — a posting, a batch run, a period close, a login, with actor and timestampThe org-wide Audit Log tab
Field historyThe delta — old value to new value, per field, per changeThe record's Audit Trail tab
The immutable ledgerThe accounting — entries no user can edit directlyThe Accounting Transactions behind every posting (see Data Security)

Common mistakes to avoid

MistakeWhy it hurtsDo this instead
Expecting history on every fieldThe platform bounds tracked fields per object — the selection is curated, not exhaustiveCheck what's tracked before promising an auditor field-level history of something obscure
Using field history to answer event questions"Did the batch run?" and "who exported data?" aren't field changesEvent questions go to the Audit Log; delta questions come here
Reading a short trail on a posted document as missing dataIt's the opposite — the lock stopped changes, so there were none to recordExpect rich histories on drafts and master data, quiet ones after posting
Adjusting the tracked-field selection casuallyA field removed from tracking stops accumulating history you may later wish existedChange the selection as a compliance decision, documented, with the reviewer's questions in mind
Treating field history as the accounting recordIt proves who changed a field — the ledger proves what was bookedUse all three layers together; each answers a different question

Why it matters (a compliance note)

Field history is the fine-grained end of your evidence chain: the Audit Log proves the event, field history proves the delta, and the immutable ledger proves the accounting. Together they give SOX-style reviews what they ask for — who changed what, when, with before-and-after values — without any additional tooling.

Three proofs, one answer. When a review asks "who changed what, when, with before-and-after values?", the chain answers in order: Audit Log for the event, field history for the delta, the immutable ledger for the accounting. No additional tooling — the evidence is already being written.

Where to go next

  1. Audit Logging — the event-level companion.
  2. Data Security & Sharing — the protection stack.

Frequently asked questions

The critical ones on each REDA Financials object — statuses, amounts, key relationships (vendor, customer, entity), dates and ownership. The platform bounds how many fields per object can be tracked, so the shipped selection is curated for control value.

Yes — your administrator can adjust the selection where your needs differ. Treat it as a compliance decision: within the platform's per-object bound, swapping a field in usually means weighing another one out.

On the record — it's part of the Audit Trail tab on document pages. Each row reads old value → new value, with author and timestamp.

Because posting locks the document — a short trail after the Posted status change is the locking doing its job. The interesting histories belong to drafts and master data, where edits are legal.

Field history answers delta questions: from what, to what, by whom, on this record. The Audit Log answers event questions org-wide: postings, batch runs, period closes, logins, exports. Investigations often use both — event first, delta second.

Official Salesforce documentation Field history tracking is a standard Salesforce platform feature — the authoritative reference is Field History Tracking. Links open in a new tab.

Was this article helpful?