REDA One Help Center
EN
Language
English EN Español ES Português PT Italiano coming soon Français FR Deutsch coming soon العربية coming soon
reda.one ↗
Home / REDA Financials AI / Financial Reports / Financial Statements / Cash Flow Statement (IAS 7)

Cash Flow Statement (IAS 7)

Profit is an opinion; cash is a fact. A company can post handsome net income while its bank account bleeds — rising receivables, big equipment purchases — and only the cash flow statement shows it. REDA Financials builds the statement on the indirect method (the IAS 7 / ASC 230 standard presentation): start from profit, undo the non-cash items, and explain where cash really went.

Getting there. Open the App Launcher (the grid icon at the top-left of any page) → REDA Financials AI → the Financial Center tab, then set Report Type to Cash Flow Statement and click Run Report.
Access you'll need. Any REDA Financials permission set can open the Financial Center tab and run the cash flow statement; what you see is limited to the records your role can read.
A Cash Flow Statement in REDA Financials AI for Meridian Properties US LLC: Cash Flows from Operating Activities 307,800.00 starting with Net Profit / (Loss) for the Period 152,300.00, followed by Adjustments for Non-Cash Items listing depreciation and impairment accounts, and Changes in Working Capital (Inflows) 246,100.00 listing receivable and tax credit accounts.
The indirect method in action: begin at net profit ($152,300), add back non-cash charges, then adjust for working-capital movements — the bridge from "profit" to "cash".

The three stories every cash flow tells

SectionQuestion it answers
Operating ActivitiesDoes the business generate cash? Net profit, plus non-cash add-backs (depreciation, provisions), plus/minus working-capital changes (receivables up = cash trapped; payables up = cash conserved).
Investing ActivitiesWhat are we building or selling? Asset purchases out, disposal proceeds in.
Financing ActivitiesHow is it funded? Capital and loans in, repayments and dividends out.

The closing section reconciles to reality: cash accounts at the start, the net change, cash at the end — a figure your bank reconciliations have already proven.

The statement's skeleton

Run without a framework, the statement builds itself from your accounts' Cash Flow Categories into a fixed, readable tree:

SectionWhat fills it
Cash Flows from Operating ActivitiesOpens with a computed Net Profit / (Loss) for the Period line — the income statement's Grand Total for the same range — then Adjustments for Non-Cash Items (depreciation-style add-backs), then Changes in Working Capital (Inflows) and Changes in Working Capital (Outflows).
Cash Flows from Investing ActivitiesInvesting inflows (disposal proceeds) and outflows (asset purchases).
Cash Flows from Financing ActivitiesFinancing inflows (loans drawn, capital) and outflows (repayments, dividends).
Cash and Cash EquivalentsThe Cash Accounts themselves — the accounts categorized Excluded — shown as an opening-to-closing reconciliation that the three sections above must explain.
Grand TotalOperating + Investing + Financing = the period's net cash change.

The working-capital lines are period deltas, with the sign flipped into cash terms: a receivable balance that grew during the period consumed cash (customers holding your money), so it appears as an outflow; a payable that grew conserved cash and appears as an inflow. Meridian's screenshot reads exactly this way — net profit 152,300, plus non-cash add-backs, plus 246,100 of working-capital inflows, giving operating cash of 307,800.

If you maintain reporting framework groups tagged for the cash flow statement, they replace this default tree entirely — your headings, your order — the same way frameworks restyle the other statements.

No separate cash module. The statement recomputes from the same posted ledger as the trial balance and P&L, every run — there's nothing to refresh and no copy to go stale. What makes it different is classification: each account's Cash Flow Category, described next.

The one setup that makes it work: Cash Flow Category

Each GL account carries a Cash Flow Category that tells the statement where it belongs: Operating — Inflow/Outflow/Non-Cash Adjustment, Investing — Inflow/Outflow, Financing — Inflow/Outflow, or Excluded (the cash and bank accounts themselves — they're what's being explained). The classification guidance is textbook: receivables/revenue → operating inflow; payables/expenses → operating outflow; depreciation → non-cash; fixed assets → investing; loans and equity → financing. Meridian's chart shipped mapped; new accounts should get their category at creation (Cash Flow Categories).

CategoryTypical accountsWhere it lands on the statement
Operating — InflowReceivables, revenue accountsWorking-capital inflows under Operating Activities
Operating — OutflowPayables, expense accountsWorking-capital outflows under Operating Activities
Operating — Non-Cash AdjustmentDepreciation, provisions, impairmentsAdjustments for Non-Cash Items (added back to profit)
Investing — InflowAsset disposal proceedsInvesting Activities, money in
Investing — OutflowFixed asset purchasesInvesting Activities, money out
Financing — InflowLoans drawn, share capitalFinancing Activities, money in
Financing — OutflowLoan repayments, dividendsFinancing Activities, money out
ExcludedCash and bank accounts, intercompany accountsThe closing Cash and Cash Equivalents reconciliation — the thing being explained, not a flow

Two scoping rules follow from the design: only accounts with a category appear on the statement, and the system's receivables/payables control accounts are kept out of the line listing.

An unmapped account is an invisible account. Only categorized accounts appear on the statement — an account without a Cash Flow Category silently sits out, and your net change may stop tying to the cash accounts. Month-end habit: any new GL accounts this period? Check their category.

Setting up the run

The filters work as on every statement (full reference): entity rows with their default ledgers, one or more From/To ranges (labels become column headers), optional framework, Hide Zero Balances, and dimension filters that recompute the whole statement for one slice. With exactly two date ranges a Variance column appears — quarter-over-quarter operating cash is one of the most honest trend lines a business has. Multiple entities work too, with the usual currency discipline: mixed currencies switch the run to corporate currency automatically ("Multiple currencies detected — showing in corporate currency"), and the badge above the report names the money ("All amounts in USD").

Common mistakes to avoid

MistakeWhy it hurtsDo this instead
Creating a GL account without a Cash Flow CategoryThe account silently sits out of the statement, and the net change may stop tying to the cash sectionSet the category at account creation; make "new accounts categorized?" a month-end checklist line
Categorizing a bank account as OperatingCash accounts are what the statement explains — treating one as a flow double-counts it and breaks the closing reconciliationBank and cash accounts are Excluded; so are intercompany accounts
Reading working-capital signs backwards"Receivables up" feels like good news, but on this statement it's an outflow — cash trapped with customersRead the section as cash movement, not business performance; the P&L carries the performance story
Expecting gross customer receipts and vendor paymentsThe indirect method reports changes, not gross flows — hunting for a specific payment here always failsDrill a line for its transactions, or read gross flows on the banking side
Comparing the cash section against a bank statement from a different dateThe statement's cash figures follow your Date To, the bank's follow theirsAlign the dates, then the closing cash line and the reconciled bank balances should agree
The 30-second integrity read. Before circulating a run, check two ties: the Net Profit / (Loss) line equals the income statement's Grand Total for the same range, and the closing cash figure matches what your reconciled bank balances say for the Date To. Both hold automatically when the category mapping is complete — which makes them the fastest test that it is.

Where to go next

  1. Cash Flow Categories — the mapping reference.
  2. Balance Sheet — the positions whose deltas drive working capital.
  3. Report Filters & Dimensions — periods, entities, frameworks.

Frequently asked questions

Read the working-capital lines: growing receivables (customers slower to pay) or shrinking payables are the usual culprits — real business signals worth acting on (see your AR aging). That divergence is exactly what this statement exists to expose.

It reduced profit but no cash left the building — the cash went out years ago when the asset was bought (an investing outflow then). The indirect method un-counts every such non-cash charge to get from profit to cash.

The statement is indirect-method — the presentation standards accept (and companies overwhelmingly use) it. For gross operating receipts/payments detail, the bank side and the GL drill-downs carry the raw flows.

It marks the cash and bank accounts themselves (and intercompany accounts). They don't appear as flows — they appear in the closing Cash and Cash Equivalents section as the opening-to-closing reconciliation that the Operating, Investing and Financing sections must add up to explain.

It's computed for your exact date range from the revenue and expense activity — the same arithmetic as the income statement's Grand Total. If the two ever disagree, the scopes differ: check entity, ledger, dates and dimension filters.

Account-level amounts drill to their transactions like every statement in the Financial Center — useful when an investing outflow deserves a "which asset was that?" (see Drill-Down).

Was this article helpful?