Cloning Budgets for Next Year
Next year's budget rarely starts from a blank page — it starts from this year's, adjusted for what you learned. The practical recipe in REDA Financials: create the new year's budget shell, carry the lines over (the CSV import makes this painless), adjust, and post. Fifteen minutes, most of it thinking about the numbers rather than typing them.
Access you'll need. Creating and editing budgets and their lines, and posting them, requires the Accounting Admin v2 or Accounting Controller v2 permission set. The Accounts Payable v2, Accounts Receivable v2, and Read Only v2 sets can view budgets but not change them.
The year-end recipe
Create the new budget shell
New Budget: same entity and type, name it for the new year (FY2027 Operating Budget), and — the detail that matters — Start Date 1 Jan 2027 and End Date 31 Dec 2027, because next year's purchases find this budget by their date falling inside that range. Set Fiscal Year = 2027 too as a tidy reporting label, but the dates are what drive the matching.
Carry the lines over
Build your line sheet from this year's budget (its Budget Lines list exports cleanly, or start from the form's Download Template), adjust the amounts in the spreadsheet — this is where the 4% utility increase and the repairs lesson from March get applied — then Choose CSV File to load them. Accounts are matched by name; the import replaces whatever lines the draft had.
Review, approve, post — before January 1
Committed and Actual start at zero (history never copies — it belongs to the old year). Post once approved, so the first January PO already has its ceiling. The old budget needs no ceremony: it simply ends with its date range, and its record — original plan, amendments, outcome — stays intact forever.
Concretely: after March's $15,000 transfer from Professional Fees to Repairs (see Budget Entries), Meridian's FY2027 worksheet starts from the amended reality, not January's guess:
| GL Account | FY2026 Budgeted | FY2026 Effective | FY2027 starting point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repairs & Maintenance — Buildings | $120,000 | $135,000 | $135,000 — the repairs lesson, priced in |
| Professional Legal and Consulting Fees | $30,000 | $15,000 | $15,000 — last year's overshoot not repeated |
| Utilities — Buildings | $45,000 | $45,000 | $46,800 — the 4% tariff increase applied ($45,000 × 1.04) |
The remaining lines carry across at their effective amounts until the review says otherwise. Every number in the new sheet is a decision — that's the feature, not the overhead.
What starts fresh — and what never copies
| In the new year's budget | |
|---|---|
| Lines & amounts | Whatever your reviewed sheet says — each new Budgeted Amount is the original allocation of the new year |
| Committed / Actual | Zero. History belongs to the old year's records and stays there |
| Approved Increases / Decreases | Zero — last year's amendments were last year's decisions; their lessons live in the numbers you chose |
| Status / Approval | Draft, unapproved — the new promise earns its own sign-off before posting |
| Budget Entries | None — the amendment trail never transfers between budgets |
| Notes | Whatever you write — the ideal place to record "carried at FY26 effective" or "one-off removed" |
The January overlap, handled
- Both budgets can be posted at once — they don't collide, as long as their date ranges don't overlap: each transaction is governed by the budget whose Start–End range covers its own date. December's late POs check against the 2026 budget; January's first PO checks against the 2027 one.
- Invoices for last year's POs keep liquidating against last year's budget lines through the PO-line link, even when they arrive in January — the commitment ledger follows the promise, not the calendar.
- Retire (void) the old budget only when its last matched invoices have landed — voiding is about preventing new references, not about closing the year.
Common mistakes to avoid
| Mistake | Why it hurts | Do this instead |
|---|---|---|
| Copying last year's Budgeted instead of Effective | Every amendment — the year's hard-won lessons — is silently discarded | Export or read the Effective column as your starting sheet |
| Posting the new budget with the old dates unchanged | Two budgets' date ranges overlap the same period; which one governs a purchase becomes ambiguous | Set new Start/End dates (1 Jan – 31 Dec of the new year) before posting; update the Fiscal Year label to match for tidiness |
| Waiting until January to post | The first POs of the year post with "No budget line found" — uncontrolled by accident | Approve and post in December, so day one has its ceiling |
| Voiding the old budget on 1 January | December's POs still have invoices coming — their liquidation needs the old budget's lines | Retire it only after the last matched invoices land |
| Carrying one-off amounts forward untouched | Last year's lobby renovation funds this year's nothing — free money nobody planned | Zero the one-offs in the sheet; note why in the line's Notes |
Where to go next
- Creating Budgets & Budget Lines — the mechanics referenced here.
- Budget Utilisation Reports — mining this year for next year's numbers.
- Closing the Books — the year-end this dovetails with.
Frequently asked questions
The reliable, always-available path is the recipe above — shell plus CSV lines. It also happens to be the better process: the spreadsheet step is where next year's thinking happens, and the import guarantees you reviewed every number you're promising.
That's a policy question ("carry-forward") rather than a system one — REDA Financials doesn't roll balances automatically. If your organization carries forward, add the amount to the new year's line and record the reasoning in the line's Notes.
Set Start/End to your fiscal span — say 1 April 2026 to 31 March 2027. Matching works on the actual dates, so every purchase dated inside that span finds the budget no matter which calendar year it falls in. A non-calendar fiscal year needs nothing special; the Fiscal Year field is just a label (write it "2026", "FY26-27", however your team reads it) and does not affect matching.
Never — the amendment trail belongs to the budget it amended and stays there, permanently. What carries forward is their outcome: by starting your sheet from the Effective amounts, the approved changes are already inside the new Budgeted numbers, and the new year begins with a clean trail.
The spreadsheet, yes; the budget, per entity. Each entity gets its own budget in its own home currency, and each line's GL account must be global or belong to that entity. The CSV recipe makes the per-entity copies cheap — the thinking transfers, the record doesn't.
Was this article helpful?